>>>>> Chris Marshall <[email protected]> writes: >>>>> On 2/3/2011 1:41 PM, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
>> Any suggestions?
> There has been discussion about reworking the PDL::PP engine in
> similar directions.
My understanding of the PDL::PP approach is that it allows for
higher-level code (the “loop” construct in particular) to be
compiled to machine code via C.
However, I see that it's only possible to run the resulting
compiled procedures sequentially; so, there'd be, roughly, so
many loops as there operations.
(I cannot readily see a way to overcome this particular issue,
but I've got the feeling that there may be one.)
> Some of the discussion may be on the pdl-porters list in addition to
> the perldl list.
A more specific pointer, please? (A Date: or Subject: would be
sufficient for me, I guess.)
--
FSF associate member #7257
pgpJnQ507jRNv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Perldl mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
