On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Joel Berger <[email protected]> wrote: > I see that you are working on NiceSlice2, but I keep wondering if there > isn't some way to do something like it (probably not drop-in replacement) > using Devel::Declare.
Interesting. I'm not sure it would work so well to upgrade PDL::NiceSlice but it could work for adding a FORALL construct to pdl. > Also, and while I have tried I have failed miserably, I have been wanting to > figure out how to make a useful PDL type for Moose, and most importantly > compatible with MooseX::Storage. That way I can make my physics simulations > within Moose and have attributes which are piddles and cache results for > future use. I'm only familiar with Moose enough to implement the pdl2 shell but maybe you could do this by implementing a wrapper class for pdl using the has-a approch as in PDL::Objects. That might provide enough perl "glue" to get the job done... > I know these are big items and probably not practical for the next or even > near future release, but they are what have crossed my gray matter recently. > Thanks for all the work you have put into PDL Chris, it makes my research > much easier! You're welcome and thanks for the thoughts. --Chris >> Hope that a better subject generates better >> feedback.... >> >> --Chris >> >> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Chris Marshall <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Executive Summary: >> > * Let's have a PDL-2.4.10 release this Fall. >> > * What would you like to see in it? >> > * Can you help? >> > >> > Long Version: >> > >> > The current PDL-2.4.9_003 release is testing >> > well with CPAN Testers and with the new pthreads >> > support, I would like to see a PDL-2.4.10 official >> > release in the next 2-3 months. >> > >> > I would be happy for that release to include bug >> > fixes for the catastrophic bugs (e.g., segfaults!) >> > and the "easy-fixes" bugs (i.e., easy fixes for the >> > right developer). >> > >> > Among my own development projects, I would >> > like to complete the NiceSlice2 implementation >> > and finish back compatibility for the pdl2 >> > implementation (so we can go back to a single >> > PDL shell, even if the original perldl one is being >> > called behind the scenes). >> > >> > What would you like to see for PDL-2.4.10? >> > >> > --Chris >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Perldl mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl > > _______________________________________________ Perldl mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
