PDL Users- The current implementation of maximum, minimum, and the related operations are inconsistent with respect to NaN values in the input data.
As long as the first element is a number, then the routines treat NaNs as missing values. If the first value is NaN then the output is NaN which is inconsistent with the former since the result will not be NaN unless all the values are NaN. I would like to fix this so the result is consistent and am leaning towards the missing value option. That is (1/dim(0)) of what we were usually calculating. :-) Please reply with your concurrence or any other thoughts/viewpoints. Thanks, Chris _______________________________________________ Perldl mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
