Craig - I'll get to some of your other idea on the porters list, but you suggested a very good idea for this function: detecting a change by hashing the input and the output. That's a good idea. It would allow me to re-implement my idea as an affine transformation and keep from using any additional ram. For those of you following along, as implemented, my idea makes a copy of the data that it is checking, which can obviously be a problem if you've added one of these callback slices to a piddle with a gigabyte of data.
David -- Sent via my carrier pigeon. _______________________________________________ Perldl mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
