Some other goals that might be appropriate to include in such a refactoring:
(1) full 64-bit address/index support for PDL (2) performance measurements of PDL (3) specific optimizations where needed Cheers, Chris On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 9:12 AM, David Mertens <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Craig DeForest <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Cool. 2.4.11, here we come! :-) >> >> BTW, something we might want to think about is a 2.5 with a refactored, or >> at least massaged, core. There are a LOT of archaisms down in the Basic/* >> code. There is some merit (and probably speed gain) to be had simply from >> getting a couple of us to take a pass or two through there and clean out the >> cruft and grot. > > > This needs to happen. I'm not sure where it fits in the list of priorities, > but if a group of us are interested, I say we go for it. I will want to be > involved in this, though I won't be able to work on it until 2.4.10 is > released. As both you and I are going to be involved in adding Graphics > modules for 2.4.11, maybe this should wait until after that gets released. > > If a few of us decide to go about this, I would suggest we aim for > collective wisdom and start making use of the IRC channel, which I just > started using again myself. It's fun! > > David _______________________________________________ Perldl mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
