> > I've added a bookchecker program (a.k.a. a renamed > podchecker script with use lib (qw(inc)); in it to > use the slightly modified Pod::Checker::podchecker() > routine. It doesn't complain about the =ff or the > O<> pod syntax additions from pod2pdf. > > That's good to hear - but does this add another dependency to most people's Perl, or is it in the perl core?
Also, we might be better off to implement our > own version of pod2pdf for the PDL::Book activity. > The limitations of the existing pod2pdf are > somewhat artificial and might be addressed by > coding it up ourselves. > > This sounds very good - can this be done before the release? NOTE: We could save a lot of space in the PDL::Book > distribution if we could replace the images by > scripts to generate them, e.g., figure1.png.PL > > My only caution would be the PGPLOT dependency required for making the figure 'on the fly' as required. Thinking about this more, do you mean that we'd put PDL::Book inside the distribution with the *.png.PL scripts, but build the Book outside the distribution with the images included? Cheers, Matt -- Matthew Kenworthy / Assistant Professor / Leiden Observatory Niels Bohrweg 2 (#463) / P.O. Box 9513 / 2300 RA Leiden / NL
_______________________________________________ Perldl mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
