Maybe this could be fixed for PDL-2.4.11 or PDL-2.5? I wonder how common it is and what the reason for that in the implementation.
--Chris On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 7:43 PM, chm <[email protected]> wrote: > On 1/23/2012 6:12 PM, David Mertens wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Chris >> Marshall<[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> I was trying to calculate atan2() of a [2,N] pdl >>> and got the following error: >>> >>> pdl> p $allind->shape >>> [2 40] >>> >>> pdl> p atan2($allind->using(0,1)) >>> Compile error: Not enough arguments for atan2 at (eval 495) line 7, near >>> ")) >>> >>> " >>> BEGIN not safe after errors--compilation aborted at (eval 495) line 7. >>> >>> The problem is that the prototype for atan2() appears to >>> require two piddle arguments, specifically. Does anyone >>> know if there is a way to make the above work or is >>> this a restriction of the current PDL implementation? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Chris >>> >> >> Wow, that's a toughy. However, reading the docs, I see this: >> >> Note that when calling this function explicitly you need to supply a third >> argument that should generally be zero (see first example). This >> restriction is expected to go away in future releases. >> >> So, you could call it like so (note the trailing zero): >> >> PDL::atan2($a->using(0,1), 0) > > > Very mysterious...thanks for the fix. --Chris _______________________________________________ Perldl mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
