I can check, but I think I will rebuild blead first, just so that I can be sure its clean.
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Chris Marshall <[email protected]>wrote: > Does 2.4.10 work too? Just to see if we *have* to push > out a quick update release or not... > > On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Joel Berger <[email protected]> > wrote: > > PDL v2.4.10_003 just successfully built on my copy of blead that I > compiled > > just a few days ago (actually just after reading that post from rjbs). It > > was totally fresh, nothing else installed. > > > > This is perl 5, version 15, subversion 9 (v5.15.9-265-g1530a57) built for > > i686-linux > > > > Looks good! > > > > Joel > > > > On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 8:45 AM, chm <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Thanks to the Perl Weekly, it has been reported that > >> perl 5.16.0 is in the final steps of the release > >> process and we need to determine any possible issues > >> with PDL-2.4.10, PDL-2.4.10_003, and pdl git. > >> > >> Specifically, we need folks to test against the latest > >> perl-5.16.0 with PDL so we can fix any bugs for a > >> quick release to update PDL to fully support the > >> new stable perl release. > >> > >> This blog entry has some thoughts for what is needed: > >> http://rjbs.manxome.org/rubric/entry/1955 > >> > >> Please report any issues ASAP to the perldl or > >> pdl-porters list and update or create any bug > >> tickets needed. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Chris > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Perldl mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl > > > > >
_______________________________________________ Perldl mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
