I'm confused, do we bundle Carp.pm? That strikes me as a really bad idea!

Joel

On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 8:29 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> As regards 2.4.11_010 on various perls on MS Windows:
>
> The problem with PGPLOT/Window.pm and Filter::Simple still persists.
>
> And, on perl-5.8.8 and perl-5.8.9, the 'perl Makefile.PL' step fails with:
>
> String found where operator expected at inc/Carp.pm line 146, near "$arg
> =~ s/'/\\'"
> Global symbol "$where" requires explicit package name at inc/Carp.pm line
> 118.
> Global symbol "$db_arg" requires explicit package name at inc/Carp.pm line
> 118.
> Global symbol "$db_arg" requires explicit package name at inc/Carp.pm line
> 118.
> Global symbol "$arg" requires explicit package name at inc/Carp.pm line
> 118.
> Global symbol "$arg" requires explicit package name at inc/Carp.pm line
> 118.
> Global symbol "$arg" requires explicit package name at inc/Carp.pm line
> 118.
> Global symbol "$arg" requires explicit package name at inc/Carp.pm line
> 118.
> Global symbol "$arg" requires explicit package name at inc/Carp.pm line
> 118.
> Global symbol "$arg" requires explicit package name at inc/Carp.pm line
> 118.
> Global symbol "$arg" requires explicit package name at inc/Carp.pm line
> 118.
> inc/Carp.pm has too many errors.
> Compilation failed in require at 
> C:/MinGW/perl588/lib/warnings.**pm<http://warnings.pm>line 134.
> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at 
> C:/MinGW/perl588/lib/warnings.**pm<http://warnings.pm>line 134.
> Compilation failed in require at C:/MinGW/perl588/lib/warnings/**
> register.pm <http://register.pm> line
> 24.
> Compilation failed in require at C:/MinGW/perl588/lib/vars.pm line 7.
> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at C:/MinGW/perl588/lib/vars.pm line 7.
> Compilation failed in require at inc/Devel/CheckLib.pm line 8.
> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at inc/Devel/CheckLib.pm line 8.
> Compilation failed in require at Makefile.PL line 2.
> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at Makefile.PL line 2.
>
> Line 118 contains the // operator which, as we all know, wasn't
> implemented until 5.10.0.
>
> Do we want to modify the code in Carp.pm to make it compatible with 5.8.x
> ? ... or just "up" the minimum perl version required to 5.010 ?
>
> Cheers,
> Rob
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Perldl mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.jach.hawaii.**edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl<http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl>
>
_______________________________________________
Perldl mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl

Reply via email to