It appears from the response to date, that PDL datatypes support is fine as it is. Maybe it makes sense to remove that task from the list of goals for PDL3 this summer?
Feedback welcome! Chris On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Chris Marshall <[email protected]> wrote: > All PDL Users- > > > We would like to add to the list of datatypes supported by > PDL objects. > > The list of standard C data types is not complete and it > doesn't covertypes from C99---especially complex numbers > where we've rolled ourown in a number of incompatible > and confusing ways. > > We would like to add more general object types as well > to allow forPDL to better interface with other computational, > data, imaging libraries by supporting arrays of structs, > pointers, objects... > > If you have problems where you needed a new, different, or > custom datatype in PDL but didn't have it, please reply with > specific use cases: > > - what datatype was needed > - description of problem > - implementation requirements > - other background > > Thanks in advance, > Chris > _______________________________________________ Perldl mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
