maybe I made a mistake with my first mail. Sorry for reposting. Jurgen
Am 20.06.2013 um 13:27 schrieb Jürgen Mück <[email protected]>: > It does, I'm using this construction all the time without any problems. > > Your example could be extended: > _______________________________ > > package MyPack; > > use Moose; > > # has (Attributes), extends, with ... > > # unload all Moose stuff that's no longer necessary > __PACKAGE__->meta->make_immutable; > no Moose; > > use PDL; > # use more modules > > # Moose specific methods, even when using PDL, are no problem here > sub BUILD { > # ... > } > > # your methods > sub xyz { > # ... > } > > 1; > _______________________________ > > This also works with roles, except for meta->make_immutable > > Jurgen > > > > > Von: Kaj Wiik <[email protected]> > An: perldl list <[email protected]> > Gesendet: 11:32 Donnerstag, 20.Juni 2013 > Betreff: Re: [Perldl] PDL and Moose > > Many thanks, David! > > That's it, now it is obvious of course! > > It seems that the following structure works at least for a simple test > package: > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > packace MyPack; > use Moose; > > # Define attributes (PDL not generally, ever?, needed) > has 'foo' .... > .... > > no Moose; > use PDL; > > # Define methods (where PDL is needed) > sub doit { > ..... > > 1; > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Cheers, > Kaj > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Perldl mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl > >
_______________________________________________ Perldl mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
