Or, if we want to avoid Java, Apache Lucy, which is similar, and written in C. :-)
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 7:12 AM, David Mertens <[email protected]>wrote: > Doesn't the Google custom search at pdl.perl.org offer a more useful > search functionality? If not, Apache Lucene comes to mind. > > David > > > On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Chris Marshall <[email protected]>wrote: > >> I think the PDL lists would be more useful if we had >> better search, index, and visualization capabilities. >> In many instances, the existing search box just >> does not return anything. When it does it is difficult >> to locate the item desired and often it is missed. >> >> Given that we have the full list archives, it would >> seem possible to create a browsable index form >> to permit viewing and coordinating different list >> posts. Ideally, a similar type of semantic analysis >> of the #pdl IRC channel might be useful there too. >> >> Any ideas or implementations for a google-lite >> version of our archives? >> >> --Chris >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Perldl mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl >> > > > > -- > "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. > Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, > by definition, not smart enough to debug it." -- Brian Kernighan > -- "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it." -- Brian Kernighan
_______________________________________________ Perldl mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
