It may actually be an issue with 64bit indexing and not the FFT convention change. Please don't use PDL::FFTW until I can verify correct operation.
--Chris On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Chris Marshall <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, nothing has changed with PDL::FFTW, just the internal PDL::FFT. > Ignore the test failures. Better yet, submit a patch to fix... :-) > > Happy PDL-ing! > Chris > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Luis Mochan <[email protected]> wrote: >> Thanks Chris, >> >> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 12:32:40PM -0400, Chris Marshall wrote: >>> The tests need to be updated since the PDL::FFT sign >>> convention for PDL-2.007 has changed. Thanks for the >>> report. >> If the problem is with the tests, is it reasonable to install the >> package anyway? >> Best regards, >> Luis >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Perldl mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl _______________________________________________ Perldl mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
