The one downside will be short text ads at the bottom of every list email. But other than that I think it is smart to move them.
While we're at it, does it also make sense to import the pre-2005 archives? We would have in one place complete archives from pdl-porters back to 1997 February and from perldl back to 1996 June, except for about 6 months at the beginning of 2005 which seem to be lost. New lists @ SF must have the form pdl-xxxxx...@lists.sourceforge.net. I think "general" would work well for the current perldl list. Could keep the dev list as pdl-porters, or perhaps pdl-devel. I was about to say that it would be nice to move them to SF to decentralize the admin process (not that the JACH folks have been anything but helpful!) but find I can not get into the pdl-commit Mailman Admin screen because it is administered by tpickering. So there will still be one main admin per list. Derek On Aug 29, 2014, at 8:32 AM, Chris Marshall <devel.chm...@gmail.com> wrote: > The JACH hosting of perldl and pdl-porters mailing > lists is about to end. Our sf.net site supports > mailing lists via the same user interface as we've > been using. > > Once I confirm that we can access the archive > mbox files I propose migrating to the lists.sf.net > to avoid interruption of service. > > Comments? > Chris > > _______________________________________________ > PDL-porters mailing list > pdl-port...@jach.hawaii.edu > http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/pdl-porters > _______________________________________________ Perldl mailing list Perldl@jach.hawaii.edu http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
