Piers Cawley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Adam Spiers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > In TestRunner, start_test() prints "." for each test, add_error()
> > prints "E", add_error() prints "F", and add_pass() does nothing.
> >
> > Wouldn't it be less confusing to change start_test() to do nothing,
> > and add_pass() to print "." ? That way, the number of characters
> > output by a given set of tests always remains constant, no matter
> > which fail or encounter errors.
>
> What's JUnit's behaviour in this context? We should do that.
It looks like add_pass is something we (Brian?) added. I like it, and
I think we should take advantage of it -- I'd prefer us to improve on
JUnit and then document unexpected differences rather than aim for a
100% clone. Does that conflict with other people's ideas of the goals
of PerlUnit?
_______________________________________________
Perlunit-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/perlunit-devel
