From: "Matthew Astley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [again, and again from 9th April]
>
> I've bunged another selftest in the 't' directory. It just checks that
> all the examples give the expected output - my penance for breaking
> them last time. I suspect it might be a little too sensitive, but it's
> a start.
Great! Thank you for that.
> It's written without HarnessUnit, partly because it doesn't need that
> and also so that won't be a show-stopper if it breaks. Oh, and it will
> probably break under Windoze because of the stderr redirection. 8-(
> Any suggestions?
You could take it out under Windows, based on the $^O variable,
just to prevent it from blowing up, for a cheap solution.
> I'm contemplating making a Debian package of perlunit, mainly so I can
> roll forwards/backwards without messing about. I'm not an official
> developer but there's no reason why I can't get registered and boost
> our eyeball count. Will this be of any use to anyone else?
Why not? Sounds like a good idea. We have to be aware
of version consistency then.
Cheers,
Christian
_______________________________________________
Perlunit-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/perlunit-devel
