Matthew Astley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > (Yes, I'm still here .. sorry I've been so quiet, I'm mostly using > JUnit instead, at the moment!)
Traitor! ;-) > On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 02:49:39PM +0000, Adam Spiers wrote: > Surely the main thing is that the respective authors maintain their > copyright over & credit for the project? In which case, having each > individual file point at the credits/licence and then putting a decent > history in that file should do the trick? IANAL... Well yes, I'm sure that's the main thing as far as anyone is concerned. However... > Your point though, is (?) that it's the delicacy of refactoring the > credits which is the problem, not the legality. No, it's the legality I was worried about, since the refactoring is still giving everyone the credit they deserve. > If the new file structure serves the same legal purpose then surely > you're only obliged to ask each author out of politeness? That's the thing, I'm not sure it does, because it would in effect take a file copyrighted by person A and make it copyrighted by persons A, B, C ... I can't imagine anyone caring, but it's probably worth thinking about anyway. _______________________________________________ Perlunit-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/perlunit-devel
