RK> So, question 1. Anyone out there...? I guess so.
RK> Question 2. I played a bit with Test::Unit awhile ago and quite liked RK> it. I thought I read once there is/might be integration of Test::Unit RK> with Test::More or Test::Harness? Test::Unit::HarnessUnit. It's a test runner which outputs in the same format that Test::Harness expects. Look at http://search.cpan.org/src/ASPIERS/Test-Unit-0.24/t/assert.t RK> The reason I ask both questions is because like many (some?) I am RK> feeling the need to add automated testing to my good development habits RK> so I am doing some test module shopping. I like the way Test::Unit RK> worked but Test::More and Test::Harness seem to be the "standard" way in RK> the Perl community. RK> Thus I am torn. If Test::Unit has been abandoned then that may answer RK> my question for me. On the other hand, if maintenance/advancement RK> continues and Test::Unit test scripts can easily be incorporated with RK> Test::Harness, etc. then I would much rather be liking that... Test::Unit is abandoned in some way, but it still work. %) aa29 ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________ Perlunit-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/perlunit-users
