I was just looking at the TLS deployment statistics.

https://www.trustworthyinternet.org/ssl-pulse/

A (hopefully) large % of the TLS code base has just been updated because of a vulnerability. However the number of sites supporting TLS v1.2 has barley increased over the past month.

Why is that?


Well, first, only a small fraction of the TLS installed base was actually affected by Heartbleed. Second, if you have a TLS v1.0 product and you want to bump that to TLS v1.2, it requires development work. Finally, Heartbleed reinforced the opinion of some management chains that OpenSSL 1.0.1 is still "bleeding edge" and not yet ready for prime-time. (I can't count the number of people I've heard in the past month proudly proclaiming they're still on OpenSSL 0.9.8.)

<csg>

_______________________________________________
perpass mailing list
perpass@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass

Reply via email to