On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 18:38, Paul Mullowney <paulm at txcorp.com> wrote:
> I can see where this can simplify the code in aijcusp.cu. > > However, how do you propose to let the user control whether or not to use > CUSP or CUSPARSE? It's different storage and different libraries, so it should be a different MatType, right? I think it's definitely wrong to have -mat_type cusp be using CUSPARSE instead of CUSP. > > What do you mean? Look at src/mat/impls/aij/seq/umfpack/**umfpack.c for >> comparison. >> > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20120308/068b154d/attachment.html>