On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> > On Mar 12, 2012, at 1:50 PM, Sean Farley wrote: > > > What you prefer doesn't matter. > > > > Clearly. I should have known Pedantic McGee over here would want to type > more and drop a simple name. Why not just put all the headers in > include/petsc/private, Dr. Subfolder Fetish? > > Actually I screwed up initially. I should have had #include > <petsc/vec.h> etc instead of #include <petscvec.h> then we would have > the natural #include <petsc/private/vecimpl.h> and we could use private > properly. > I like this. Why not switch to it now? Dmitry. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20120312/632b1da7/attachment.html>