On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:05, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote:
> Matt has significantly modified tetgen (removing its superfluous use of >> C++) so all these symbols are different. >> > > AND you could have tested your assumption of a problem by trying it with > --download-tetgen, which > works because this is how I tested it. The --download-ctetgen option will > work shortly. > > What is this with criticizing what I do before even finding out what I > actually did? > Oh come on, how is Satish supposed to know how you intend to do things? He just made the standard argument against bundling. PETSc normally avoids bundling (unlike a lot of packages) and what you are doing with ctetgen is unconventional, so it was natural to point it out. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20120319/40b93e3c/attachment.html>