On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 21:11, Dmitry Karpeev <karpeev at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> This is probably implied by what's already on the list, but we need an > easy way for the *users* to build individual > examples, as well as to add new examples, when they experiment with > PETSc. > This is the easiest possible case to support. We are focusing on the interoperability and multi-dependency cases because they are actually hard. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20110710/b0afdd2a/attachment.html>