On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Jed Brown <jed at 59a2.org> wrote: > On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:04:35 -0500, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> > wrote: > > > > Sorry, I was so stunned when I saw that option I just automatically > > nuked it. > > > > I have pushed 3.1 and dev with the option again. > > > > Does your code support ghosted finite differences? With this option? > > It's a finite element code, this is the way to provide a local function > (DMMGSetSNESLocal) that needs ghosting. Of course it makes no sense to > be a command line option. Matt, you're welcome to provide a proper API, > but the functionality has to be there.
Cool, I did not think anyone else was using it. Actually, this is an EXCELLENT design test case for the new-fangled DMMG stuff. It ought to make sense specifying this in the new interface. The old DMMG had no good place to do it. Thinking, Matt > > Jed > -- What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead. -- Norbert Wiener -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20100324/8725eb18/attachment.html>