Why don't you change it to MatDenseGetArrayF90() and make a new MatGetArrayF90() that does the 1d array?
and why don't you start programming in C++, not stick with your favorite language Fortran :-) Barry On Apr 10, 2010, at 6:10 AM, Matthew Knepley wrote: > Why does this not match MatGetArray()? I know it looks good from > MATDENSE, but > shouldn't this be a special dense function? This is just annoying me > since I want to > pull this out without a stupid offset. > > Matt > > -- > What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their > experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which > their experiments lead. > -- Norbert Wiener