On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 00:09, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote:
> So, you can accomodate your "Picard" iteration as Newton, but we cannot > accomodate the Picard iteration for > a system of nonlinear equations with that. So I made a class, named Picard, > to accomodate it. Are you really > still arguing about this? > This was a ridiculous argument when we first had it two years ago. I don't like using the name Picard for the implementation because it doesn't do what most PDE solver people refer to as Picard. Since both cases are strict subsets of what mathematicians call Picard, I don't think the name should be used for that thing in PETSc. Richardson is fine with me. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20110917/f5243984/attachment.html>
