On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Sean Farley <sean at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> No, but perhaps I should. My understanding is that those lines only need >> to be changed when ParMetis is included as a subproject, as they seem to >> have configured the build system to use relative paths. >> > > I would still have to be the one to apply the patch since PETSc is using a > heavily patched version of ParMETIS. Mark, I'll try this out on Franklin > later tonight or tomorrow. > Luckily CMake is much easier than BuildSystem. This should be a snap! Matt -- What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead. -- Norbert Wiener -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20111130/649692c1/attachment.html>
