On Jun 3, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote: > On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > > I hate C++ > > It is currently the only way to do intelligent things with multiple types. I > am trying to > send integers around. VecScatter is completely broken for this because we use > C.
You and your damn "send integers around", come up with your own damn abstraction for moving integers around and stop trying to piggy back on VecScatter :-) I do agree with you that we need to add something that is abstractly equivalent to templates into C for PETSc :-) Sean, get your clang going! Barry > > Matt > > On Jun 3, 2011, at 2:38 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote: > > > I hate fucking C. Let me push a fix. > > > > Matt > > > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > > > > /Users/barrysmith/Src/petsc-dev/arch-gnu/bin/mpicc -o ex58.o -c -Wall > > -Wwrite-strings -Wno-strict-aliasing -Wno-unknown-pragmas -g3 > > -I/Users/barrysmith/Src/petsc-dev/include > > -I/Users/barrysmith/Src/petsc-dev/arch-gnu/include -I/opt/local/include > > -D__INSDIR__=src/snes/examples/tutorials/ ex58.c > > In file included from > > /Users/barrysmith/Src/petsc-dev/include/petscvec.h:490, > > from /Users/barrysmith/Src/petsc-dev/include/petscmat.h:6, > > from /Users/barrysmith/Src/petsc-dev/include/petscdm.h:6, > > from /Users/barrysmith/Src/petsc-dev/include/petscpc.h:6, > > from /Users/barrysmith/Src/petsc-dev/include/petscksp.h:6, > > from /Users/barrysmith/Src/petsc-dev/include/petscsnes.h:6, > > from ex58.c:1: > > /Users/barrysmith/Src/petsc-dev/include/private/vecimpl.h:123: error: > > conflicting types for ?PetscSectionGetDof? > > /Users/barrysmith/Src/petsc-dev/include/private/vecimpl.h:99: error: > > previous declaration of ?PetscSectionGetDof? was here > > /Users/barrysmith/Src/petsc-dev/include/private/vecimpl.h:131: error: > > conflicting types for ?PetscSectionGetOffset? > > /Users/barrysmith/Src/petsc-dev/include/private/vecimpl.h:100: error: > > previous declaration of ?PetscSectionGetOffset? was here > > make: [ex58.o] Error 1 (ignored) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their > > experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their > > experiments lead. > > -- Norbert Wiener > > > > > -- > What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments > is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments > lead. > -- Norbert Wiener