On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> > On Jan 14, 2010, at 3:51 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote: > > I thought I was using it somewhere. I do think that this belongs. You >> should not have to >> have a solver in order to define a function over a space. >> > > Agreed there could/should be places to store functions, but it ain't DMMG. > I was mistaken here. I am using the ability of the DM to compute functions. If this DMMG is merely a pass-through, or aggregator (does it on all DMs) its alright. Matt > Barry > > > >> Matt >> >> On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: >> >> How many times am I going to have to pound it into your head that DMMG is >> a misconceived, poorly designed piece of junk :-( >> >> The pointer is not there by design and I don't have any intention of >> using it. Likely I just thought it was needed when I scrawled out the >> original code and its been there since then. >> There is a Jacobian pointer that is used, but I don't like :-( >> >> >> Barry >> >> >> On Jan 14, 2010, at 3:34 PM, Jed Brown wrote: >> >> This isn't currently used anywhere. Is there some case where it would >> be needed (rather than by calling SNESComputeFunction as is currently >> done)? >> >> Jed >> >> >> >> >> -- >> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their >> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their >> experiments lead. >> -- Norbert Wiener >> > > -- What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead. -- Norbert Wiener -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20100114/23cfbee4/attachment.html>