On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 22:40, Dmitry Karpeev <karpeev at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> And yet DMDA already defines this local fine-granularity "stencil" access. > Where would it go, if not in the DM? In my opinion this is part of the > function space definition: > it generalizes VecGetArray to something more geometric. > I just think it should be a DM-level call. Not VecGetUberCustomIterator. Perhaps I'm wrong, but I think it belongs in the DM. Not all DMs have to implement this. > Maybe that's what you were saying too. Jed -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20101207/171c10e1/attachment.html>
