Barry Smith wrote: > > On Nov 16, 2009, at 2:50 PM, Jed Brown wrote: > >> >> so. BTW, should we put PAPI support into PETSc, it no longer needs >> kernel patches with 2.6.31. >> > The basics are there in config/PETSc/packages/PAPI.py and
This file does not exist in the repo. > initialization in plog.c and eventLog.c It would be good to add counts > for cache misses etc. Cache misses would be neat, but we have the problem of where to display it (there is limited space for extra columns in -log_summary). But it would be very slick to --download-papi and get flops for external libraries and user code. I think this can be made to work reliably on Linux from kernel 2.6.31 onward. > I got frustrated because with intel there are multiple instructions to > do similar things that have separate counts so the results you get out > are not really what you want. I see what you mean. What do we want? Some candidates L1_ICM - L1I miss L1_DCM - L1D miss L2_DCM - L2D miss L1_DCH (L1D hits) or LST_INS (load/store inst.) to be able to scale miss rates For flops we have FP_INS - floating point instructions, would count FMA as one, probably packed vector ins. are one FP_OPS - derived quantity, not clear how they distinguish between single/double SP_OPS/DP_OPS - probably better, use whichever agrees with PETSc's precision VEC_SP/VEC_DP - vector instructions, not sure this is relevant because everything is a vector instruction these days (compilers rarely use x87). Note that I'm totally new to PAPI and the interface does seem screwy (not to mention all the private nonsense dumped into the header and the documentation is in MS-Word), but it offers a lot more than just calling rdtsc myself. Jed -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 261 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20091117/727c16e5/attachment.pgp>