Simon Burton <simon at arrowtheory.com> writes:
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 19:57:02 -0500
> Matthew Knepley <knepley at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>
>>
>> > (d) m=exp(m) (pointwise exp)
>>
>> We could add pointwise operations just like the VecPointwise*().
>>
>> Matt
>
> Yes, we need MatPointwiseMult aswell.
>
> Should I make a start on this ?
I am thinking more about what Barry said. The VecPointwise*() operations
can be given a solid mathematical interpretation in terms of spinor operations.
However, I do not see anything like that for the Mat stuff yet. We need to
understand the mathematicas better.
Matt
--
"Failure has a thousand explanations. Success doesn't need one" -- Sir Alec
Guiness
