On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 10:30 PM, Peter Brune <prbrune at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com>wrote: > >> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 10:11 PM, Jed Brown <jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: >> >>> *- ptr - pointer to a structure that must have a DM as its first entry.* >>> * This ptr must have been passed into SNESDMComputeFunction() as >>> the context.* >>> >>> This is considered very bad form now since resolution-dependent >>> information in the function context tends to make it not work with grid >>> sequencing or FAS. Are we ready to remove it yet? >>> >> >> How does the DM info get there? I thought we were still using this. >> >> > SNESGetDM anyone? Having that as part of the context, and not even a > named part of the context, is terrible. > I guess I am fine with this. Its definitely no worse than the context arg. Matt > - Peter > > >> Matt >> >> -- >> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their >> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their >> experiments lead. >> -- Norbert Wiener >> > > -- What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead. -- Norbert Wiener -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20120515/30d643a6/attachment.html>
