On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Sean Farley <sean at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> No I mean I want >> >> petsc/releases/petsc-3.1 >> petsc/tools/parsing/BarrysNewHTMLMunger >> > > Sounds like you want a "traditional filesystem hierarchy" and like I said > before, your request will fall on deaf ears. This is the same request that > mercurial-dev gets from people switching from subversion: "I only want to > check out a subdirectory, not the whole project!" to which the common > response is, "You should rethink your 'project' if you only want a > subdirectory." Take a look at subrepos and subpaths: > I guess I completely understand the logic for not checking out part of a tree. There are consistency issues, and management of related changes. However, I am just talking about grouping repositories. I would be alright with any grouping strategy, be it directories, tags, etc. I think this is orthogonal to Mercurial. Matt > http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/Subrepository > http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/SubrepoRemappingPlan > > and maybe projrc: > > > http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/ProjrcExtension?action=show&redirect=SubpathsExtension > > For what it's worth, I never liked petsc-dev being in a different folder > than petsc-3.x. It is not confusing to have them all like so: > > petsc/petsc-3.1 > petsc/petsc-dev > -- What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead. -- Norbert Wiener -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20120208/4fcefcdc/attachment.html>