On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 9:10 PM, Satish Balay <balay at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Feb 2012, Jed Brown wrote: > > > It's all workable, > > but I'm not seeing a clear advantage to keeping the primary at > > petsc.cs.iit.edu, > > currently the 2 reasons that are offered agains petsc.cs.iit.edu are: > - ssh breaks - need https [to level comaprision - we can probably set > this up for folks who want this] > > - reliability concerns. > > > (provided Sean volunteers to set up mirroring in that direction). > > Personally - I'd prefer not to deal with that. If its decided that > bitbuckets is the thing ot use - we should disable petsc.cs.iit.edu, > > As you've noticed - mirroring has already caused confusion. And I > suspect this will keep coming up - much more often than the frequence > of a downed machine. The master should be on Bitbucket. We could keep a repo at IIT that is updated every time as a backup only if we need it, but for nothing else. Matt > > Satish > -- What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead. -- Norbert Wiener -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20120209/5a4c74a5/attachment.html>