On Thu, 9 Feb 2012, Satish Balay wrote: > > Credential management is simpler because adding/removing keys and similar > > can be done by the user instead of by emailing Satish. > > replaced by 'crate a bitbucket account - and email sean your bitbucket id' > > so eqivalent.
ok - I see your point. First step is equivalent. Later change of keys/passwd is up to the user and doesn't involve e-mail [ with bitbucket.] Satish > > Satish > > > I'm not deeply invested either way, but I'm not seeing a compelling > > argument not to use it. Many of the things you are requesting (separate > > clones for each release, directory hierarchies to get to the repository) > > would be considered "quirks" by other projects. I don't think PETSc is that > > "special" that it needs to use different repository management. > > > > That said, I'm not deeply invested and would rather write code than argue > > about where to store it. >
