Fix the mail headers for this thing. My message is below. Matt
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Mail Delivery System <mailer-dae...@mailrelay.anl.gov> Date: Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 9:44 PM Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender To: knepley at gmail.com This is the mail system at host mailrelay.anl.gov. I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below. For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster. If you do so, please include this problem report. You can delete your own text from the attached returned message. The mail system <petsc-dev at zimbra.anl.gov>: host zimbra.anl.gov[130.202.101.12] said: 550 5.1.1 <petsc-dev at zimbra.anl.gov>: Recipient address rejected: zimbra.anl.gov(in reply to RCPT TO command) Final-Recipient: rfc822; petsc-dev at zimbra.anl.gov Original-Recipient: rfc822;petsc-dev at zimbra.anl.gov Action: failed Status: 5.1.1 Remote-MTA: dns; zimbra.anl.gov Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 5.1.1 <petsc-dev at zimbra.anl.gov>: Recipient address rejected: zimbra.anl.gov ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Matthew Knepley <knep...@gmail.com> To: petsc-dev at zimbra.anl.gov, For users of the development version of PETSc <petsc-dev at mcs.anl.gov> Cc: Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 21:44:32 -0600 Subject: Re: [petsc-dev] Merge sets On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > > On Feb 18, 2012, at 3:18 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote: > > > I have lost the BB battle, however can we at least start using > > > > hg pull --rebase > > > > so that we avoid this > > > > https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc-dev/changeset/ad9064ecab66 > > > 1) I don't like the idea of a pull doing anything locally on my machine. > I want it to only get the stuff from the remote repository and bring it to > my machine. This reeks of svn > I see it as a replacement for multiple repositories and carefully orchestrated pulling, like Linus used to do, in order to keep change sets clean. It is not giving up on the concept of change sets like svn. > 2) If the rebase implementation has been fixed from the hacky versions > that fucked unnecessarily with my file system I'll be happy to start using > rebase. Is it fixed? > I cannot identify the behavior from that description. However, I have been using it for almost a year now, and the nice thing is that if anything goes wrong (merges with MacHg can screw up badly), I just do hg rollback hg revert --all You might be talking about the need to revert. Matt > Barry > > > > > Matt > > > > -- > > What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their > experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their > experiments lead. > > -- Norbert Wiener > > -- What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead. -- Norbert Wiener -- What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead. -- Norbert Wiener -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20120218/1cff445f/attachment.html>