On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 23:54, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote:
> Do we really need per object help? Shouldn't this be per class? Different objects may have different prefixes, e.g. MG levels, ASM subdomains, FieldSplit sub-problems. Perhaps better than per-object would be per-(class,prefix), but that is much less natural to implement and showing per object gives some indication that there are multiple objects to configure (I'm thinking of what this will look like in a GUI). -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20110826/2c3a84b8/attachment.html>
