On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> Why shouldn't they be the same? Everything should still work fine. Where > in PETSc do we make the assumption MPI_COMM_SELF is not MPI_COMM_WORLD and > why? Except for Shi's new stuff and the new elemental stuff everything else > in PETSc has worked fine with them being the same for 15 years. Hence the > problem is likely with Shri's and Hong's interactions with MPI; not with > the current MPIUNI. It is a hack to externally reference count based on PETSC_HAVE_MPIUNI or comparison for equality. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20120716/81235ea4/attachment.html>