I get an error when I try to use that: [0]PETSC ERROR: --------------------- Error Message ------------------------------------ [0]PETSC ERROR: Corrupt argument: see http://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/documentation/faq.html#valgrind! [0]PETSC ERROR: Invalid type of object: Parameter # 1! [0]PETSC ERROR: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [0]PETSC ERROR: Petsc Development HG revision: 56f27b189e4fd57f5a4b7ffd6aa6bb08bd8a4d5b HG Date: Wed Aug 29 12:03:50 2012 -0500 [0]PETSC ERROR: See docs/changes/index.html for recent updates. [0]PETSC ERROR: See docs/faq.html for hints about trouble shooting. [0]PETSC ERROR: See docs/index.html for manual pages. [0]PETSC ERROR: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [0]PETSC ERROR: ./swe on a arch-linu named Puget-101334 by user Thu Aug 30 16:35:51 2012 [0]PETSC ERROR: Libraries linked from /home/user/Desktop/LIBRARIES/petsc-dev/arch-linux2-cxx-debug/lib [0]PETSC ERROR: Configure run at Wed Aug 29 12:49:26 2012 [0]PETSC ERROR: Configure options --download-boost --download-chaco --download-ctetgen --download-f-blas-lapack --download-fiat --download-generator --download-metis --download-ml --download-mpich --download-parmetis --download-scientificpython --download-triangle --with-clanguage=cxx --with-dynamic-loading --with-shared-libraries --with-sieve PETSC_ARCH=arch-linux2-cxx-debug [0]PETSC ERROR: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [0]PETSC ERROR: PetscObjectReference() line 378 in /home/user/Desktop/LIBRARIES/petsc-dev/src/sys/objects/inherit.c application called MPI_Abort(MPI_COMM_WORLD, 64) - process 0 [unset]: aborting job: application called MPI_Abort(MPI_COMM_WORLD, 64) - process 0
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Jed Brown <jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Chris Eldred <chris.eldred at gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> How would I use PetscObjectReference((PetscObject)section) in Fortran? > > > call PetscObjectReference(section,ierr) > >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Jed Brown <jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: >> > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Its not wrong. This is the way I wanted it. You set the PetscSection >> >> and >> >> give up control. If you >> >> do not want to give up control, then call PetscObjectReference() before >> >> passing it in. >> > >> > >> > Since this is (a) different from everything else in PETSc and (b) not >> > explicitly documented, it is doubly wrong. >> >> >> >> -- >> Chris Eldred >> DOE Computational Science Graduate Fellow >> Graduate Student, Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University >> B.S. Applied Computational Physics, Carnegie Mellon University, 2009 >> chris.eldred at gmail.com > > -- Chris Eldred DOE Computational Science Graduate Fellow Graduate Student, Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University B.S. Applied Computational Physics, Carnegie Mellon University, 2009 chris.eldred at gmail.com