On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Jed Brown <jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> I would like to use complex arithmetic in some code that does polynomial > optimization in the complex plane (for adaptive smoothers), even when > PetscScalar is real. I'd like to push something like the attached, but > since this is potentially fragile, I'm posting here before pushing. Any > objections to my pushing? > > This works with my C and C++ real builds as well as C and C++ complex. I > also tried a real build that disabled PETSC_HAVE_C99_COMPLEX (because all > my compilers support it), but of course that's not much of a check. > > One thing that I think we could support (because C99 and C++ complex is > binary compatible) is choosing the complex implementation based on the > current language rather than PETSC_CLANGUAGE. > This looks good to me, but I am confused. What does this diff have to do with unstructured meshes? Matt -- What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead. -- Norbert Wiener -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20120910/e1a18457/attachment.html>
