On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Jed Brown <jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> I don't mind the promotion in principle, but we should be careful what we > mean by "coordinate DM". I don't want to assume a nodal basis, therefore > the only way to "use" a coordinate DM (or coordinate vector) is by local > evaluation which requires DM impl-specific code. If you are planning to > write DM-generic code that assumes you can get a nodal coordinate for a > given dof, then I have to object. No, I just want DM to return a coordDM and a coordVec. They can mean whatever the DM impl wants. Matt > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com>wrote: > >> Objections? >> >> Matt >> >> -- >> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their >> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their >> experiments lead. >> -- Norbert Wiener >> > > -- What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead. -- Norbert Wiener -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20120926/98338e3a/attachment.html>