Sorry, I accidentally pushed my local temp work to petsc-dev. Removed https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc-dev/commits/8a26212be9cc66c7e51ce8f4615a9c32
Hong On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Jed Brown <jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: >> >> > I still don't understand why we aren't using PETSc events to profile >> > this, >> >> If PETSc events do not provide enough useful information for >> optimizing code then we should think about what can be added/changed to >> PETSc events and log summary to so that they can be used. Perhaps >> alternative -log_summary's that do not print as much stuff etc? > > > Sure, but the code in this patch doesn't even track the rank, every rank > just spews lines of numbers to be jumbled together. > > If we have to extend events, then we'll decide how to extend events, but we > need to have a clear idea of what we're trying to accomplish.
