If we really need to write a hierarchy of shaky scripts to use oxygen, then why not just write a hierarchy of shaky scripts (like we do now) and not use doxygen?
Doxygen is an ugly dependency unless it truly delivers some fantastic feature we cannot reproduce I think it should be avoided. So what is that fantastic feature? Barry Yes sowing is an ugly dependency but at least it is OUR dependency. And yes I have no problem with Matt rewriting all of sowing in python :-) On Jan 8, 2013, at 9:32 PM, Jed Brown <jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 8:45 PM, Karl Rupp <rupp at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > I was thinking of using an input filter, perhaps after creating an index. > > http://www.stack.nl/~dimitri/doxygen/manual/config.html#cfg_input_filter > > If a single filter is sufficient for all files, this is indeed the better > option. Thanks. > > We get the file name in argv[1] so it can use the path to do different > things. For example, examples/tests/ are treated differently from > examples/tutorials/, which are different from library code.
