On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote:
> Again, there are limits to everything, and this surpasses the useful limit > to this kind of specification. This is not personal expression, this > is ease of reading. > If it's significant enough to affect ease of reading, then it's significant enough to specify. Most coding guidelines have adopted the form that Barry likes. _You_ are now advocating unconventional formatting on the grounds that it's easier for you to read, without regard for what anyone else finds easier to read. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20130121/7a9fdf41/attachment.html>