On Fri, 28 Jun 2013, Jed Brown wrote: > Satish Balay <ba...@mcs.anl.gov> writes: > > > Actually even these simplifications have caveats. If proper tracking > > is need - the we would have to do sub-repos [which we hated so much]. > > gitcommit can be similar to subrepos, but managed by --download instead > of by 'git submodule update'.
ok. So we update MOAB.py every week? Another issue - if we specify both tarballs and gitcommit - both have to point to the equivalent snapshot. [and roll in self.giturls+gitcommit into the the standard url for self.download] Satish
