Barry Smith <bsm...@mcs.anl.gov> writes: > Take a look at MatCreate_SeqAIJ. These fill up all the function > points in one swoop with the big function table, this is why there > is not "base class setup".
Those MatOps_Values are a perpetual maintenance hassle. I would replace
them all with a boring list of assignment statements for any implemented
functions, as in MatCreate_Nest. Then we wouldn't need any "dummy"
entries, the order wouldn't matter, etc.
If Microsoft would implement C99, we could use designated initializers:
static struct _MatOps MatOps_Values = {
.setvalues = MatSetValues_SeqAIJ,
.mult = MatMult_SeqAIJ,
.....
};
pgpRHkCOFwfjw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
