On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 11:32 PM, Jed Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
> Barry Smith <[email protected]> writes: > > > Why not just always assume -lm is needed and only remove -lm if it > doesn't exist? > > That would be fine with me. How does this solve the problem? You might get an error from the linker if -lm is not found (maybe not), but you still cannot test that the symbols we expect to be there are actually there. Matt -- What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead. -- Norbert Wiener
