El 23/12/2014, a las 20:38, Sean Farley escribió: > 4) Better coordination with dependent packages > > This item is hard to implement because it's out of the PETSc team's > control. For example, packages like SLEPc depend on PETSc but don't have > as good of a build system. SLEPc can't be built with a version of SLEPc > already installed in the prefix. This is unnecessarily cumbersome for > end-users.
SLEPc issues a warning in this case, but does not prevent building. I have removed the warning, since it is no longer necessary. Please report any problems. Jose