El 23/12/2014, a las 20:38, Sean Farley escribió:

> 4) Better coordination with dependent packages
> 
> This item is hard to implement because it's out of the PETSc team's
> control. For example, packages like SLEPc depend on PETSc but don't have
> as good of a build system. SLEPc can't be built with a version of SLEPc
> already installed in the prefix. This is unnecessarily cumbersome for
> end-users.

SLEPc issues a warning in this case, but does not prevent building. I have 
removed the warning, since it is no longer necessary. Please report any 
problems.

Jose

Reply via email to