OK, I can put PetscRandom back into GAMG and add a check for DIVERGE_ITS in the Cheby solve. Is that necessary and sufficient?
Mark On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Matthew Knepley <knep...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Barry Smith <bsm...@mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > >> >> > On Aug 27, 2015, at 2:15 PM, Jed Brown <j...@jedbrown.org> wrote: >> > >> > Barry Smith <bsm...@mcs.anl.gov> writes: >> >> Don't use drand48 directly; use PetscRandom. Matt promised to fix up >> PetscRandom to use it by default and work on all systems so all you need to >> do is use PetscRandom everywhere. >> > >> > Yes, that's what I meant. But we need a deterministic seed. >> >> Matt promised >> > > Its in 'next', > > -random_type rander48 > > Matt > > -- > What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their > experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their > experiments lead. > -- Norbert Wiener >
